How to Drop a Lit Match on a Paper Trail

A map outlining the proceedings and costs of bringing a foreign child into the United States. Illustration by Karissa Korman.

Programs like DACA and precedents like birthright citizenship hardly feel like paths to sanctuary when they’re the exact paper trails that any given administration can soak in gasoline to ensure the expunging of the people it’s always considered foreign. Non-white people are here on historical technicalities, and we will be removed en masse according to—not in spite of—the law. A fascist doesn’t need a lawyer with a generous interpretation of the documents at hand to light that match.

Manufactured moral panic over “anchor babies,” expired visas, impossible-to-get REAL IDs, passport renewals, I-9 forms, voter registration—the bureaucratic manhandling of cases like Khalil’s isn’t just technically legal. It’s not the unintended product of uncrossed t’s and undotted i’s in the Constitution, and it’s not a gross perversion of the founding fathers’ intent. If white nationalism is the law of the land, then immigration bans, border control, and deportations in service of that goal are the business of the United States.

A “terrorist sympathizer” allegation is sensational, and easily levied by an ostentatious figure like Trump. But the technical minutiae behind the papers and legal pathways it will take for the president to back that claim up—and keep Mahmoud Khalil disappeared—are the same for every minority population in the US and are encoded in this country on purpose. The violence of the US empire’s deportation business has two faces and two hands, but they strike the same brutal blow.

Comments

Leave a comment